[ E-commerce — premium acrylic displays ]
Plinths NY
Plinths NY is a premium e-commerce brand selling acrylic display plinths and risers. The dashboard below shows AI visibility across the four major engines on category-level prompts, plus revenue attribution from the daily Shopify order source sync. The story this data tells: organic search and Bing referrals are doing real work for transactional intent.
[ Revenue gap analysis ]
$616/mo left on the table across the top 20 money keywords
Pulled live from the GSC mirror. For each keyword we compared current ranking position to a target of #3, applied the Advanced Web Ranking 2024 industry-average CTR curve, and computed projected revenue at conversion rate 2.5% × avg deal $250. The gap is what these keywords would generate if ranked top 3 vs. ranked where they sit today.
Monthly impressions
1,355
across 20 tracked keywords
Current revenue/mo
$312
at today's positions
At target #3
$931
pos 3 CTR × conv × deal value
Annualized gap
$7,392
monthly gap × 12
Per-keyword breakdown
Sorted by monthly revenue gap (descending). Pos pills: green=top 3, amber=page 1, orange=page 2, red=beyond top 20.
| Money keyword | Current pos | Target pos | Impr/mo | Current $/mo | At target $/mo | Gap $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plinths | 7.8 | 3 | 701 | $148 | $482 | +$334 |
| food display risers | 25.2 | 3 | 68 | $1 | $47 | +$46 |
| black serving platters | 9.8 | 3 | 69 | $11 | $47 | +$36 |
| acrylic risers for food display | 11.6 | 3 | 51 | $5 | $35 | +$30 |
| acrylic buffet risers | 6.5 | 3 | 71 | $19 | $49 | +$29 |
| buffet risers | 18.4 | 3 | 44 | $2 | $30 | +$28 |
| plinths for sale | 8.4 | 3 | 45 | $9 | $31 | +$22 |
| acrylic food risers | 9.3 | 3 | 41 | $7 | $28 | +$21 |
| catering risers | 8.6 | 3 | 29 | $5 | $20 | +$14 |
| pliths | 13.7 | 3 | 22 | $2 | $15 | +$13 |
| white food risers | 8.6 | 3 | 24 | $4 | $16 | +$12 |
| black platters | 8.4 | 3 | 23 | $4 | $16 | +$11 |
| acrylic display tables | 12.3 | 3 | 19 | $2 | $13 | +$11 |
| black buffet risers | 6.5 | 3 | 24 | $7 | $16 | +$10 |
| acrylic plinth | 9.7 | 3 | 19 | $3 | $13 | +$10 |
| acrylic display table | 11.0 | 3 | 18 | $2 | $12 | +$10 |
| black food risers | 6.8 | 3 | 16 | $4 | $11 | +$7 |
| acrylic plinths | 6.7 | 3 | 14 | $4 | $10 | +$6 |
| black display risers | 10.0 | 3 | 11 | $2 | $8 | +$6 |
| plinths new york | 1.2 | 3 | 46 | $71 | $32 | +$-40 |
[ Snapshot ]
Where we stand right now
Data through 2026-05-01. Updated weekly via the Monday morning AI visibility cron.
Total AI runs
106
One run = one prompt sent to one engine
Engines tracked
4
ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity
Best engine citation rate
13.3%
perplexity cited us in 2 of 15 runs
Latest run
2026-05-01
Cron runs Mondays 8am UTC
[ How to read this ]
What does “citation rate” actually mean?
We send the same set of buyer-intent prompts (e.g., “best food display risers”, “ac repair tampa”, etc.) to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity every week. Citation rate is the percentage of those prompts where the engine actually mentioned this business in its answer.
[ 0–5% ]
Effectively invisible
Where most local businesses sit before any work. AI engines either cite a competitor or no one specific.
[ 10–25% ]
Showing up
Healthy early-stage range. Source layer fixes (GBP, citations, schema) are landing. Compounding.
[ 25–40%+ ]
Reliably cited
90-day target for category-level prompts. AI engines now consider this business a default answer.
Branded prompts (where the business name is already in the question) almost always hit 100%. The numbers above are deliberately measured on unbranded category prompts — the ones a prospect actually types when they don’t know you yet.
[ AI Visibility ]
Citation rate across the four major AI engines
Each prompt is sent through all four engines weekly. We log whether the response mentions the client and which competitors get cited instead. The bar chart shows which engines find this business most often.
Weekly trend
Citation percentage week over week (all engines combined)
Per-engine breakdown
Which engines cite us most often
Top cited URLs
The pages AI engines link to most often when they cite us
Top competitors mentioned
Who shows up when we don't (or alongside us)
No competitor mentions captured yet.
[ Google Search Console ]
Top organic queries by impressions
Last sync: 2026-04-29. Daily sync via Render cron.
| Query | Impressions | Clicks | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|
| plinths | 1,423 | 17 | 7.0 |
| plinths | 1,410 | 13 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,388 | 12 | 7.3 |
| plinths | 1,388 | 15 | 7.2 |
| plinths | 1,377 | 12 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,369 | 15 | 7.0 |
| plinths | 1,365 | 15 | 7.2 |
| plinths | 1,352 | 13 | 7.3 |
| plinths | 1,351 | 15 | 7.2 |
| plinths | 1,344 | 11 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,339 | 14 | 7.5 |
| plinths | 1,313 | 12 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,305 | 11 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,294 | 14 | 7.4 |
| plinths | 1,292 | 12 | 7.7 |
[ Revenue Attribution ]
Which channels drove revenue (last 90 days)
Pulled live from Shopify order source data. Synced daily.
Revenue by channel
Order source attribution from Shopify
Channel summary
Orders + total revenue
[ What you'd get ]
Same dashboard, your data
This is the public version of what every Living Pillar Maintenance client gets — minus the patches we ship privately each week. New cohorts onboard in 2-3 weeks via the same Setup tier (S, M, or L) used to wire this dashboard. No screenshots. No manual reports. Real-time pulls from a live Supabase, refreshed every hour.